A Bevy of Bonnets for Easter Sunday: ‘The Pamela Hat.’

Ever a work in progress; another piece of the ‘Bonnet’ portrait puzzle has been added at the end of this post today – 15th April 2020.

A Bonnet inspired post for Easter Sunday, 12th. April 2020 – that proves that the style of hat worn by Emily Brontë in a portrait by elder sister, Charlotte – was around even before the Brontës sisters came into being; the ‘Pamela Bonnet’ is 18th century.The ‘Pamela Hat’ Portrait pose also predates the Brontë sisters; a couple late 18th century ‘Pamela Hat’ style portraits can be viewed – HERE and HERE —— and here…

“The Chapeau à la Paméla, Pamela hat or Pamela bonnet – as worn by Louisa Manners Tollemache, 7th Countess of Dysart.

“The Chapeau à la Paméla, Pamela hat or Pamela bonnet described a type of straw hat or bonnet popular during the 1790s and into the first three quarters of the 19th century. It was named after the heroine of Samuel Richardson‘s 1741 novel Pamela; or, Virtue Rewarded. While Pamela hats and bonnets underwent a variety of changes in shape and form, they were always made from straw. The mid-19th-century version of the Pamela hat was a smaller version of an early 19th-century wide-brimmed style called the gipsy hat.”

Excerpt above from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. 

Note the forget-Me-Not blue scarf in both portraits...

The portrait on the left is a miniature version of the ‘Bonnet Portrait’ type —— of Emily Brontë, circa 1830. The Portrait on the left is Louisa Manners Tollemache, 7th Countess of Dysart, born 2 July 1745 – died 22 September 1840, aged 95. 

“The portrait of Louisa by Sir Joshua Reynolds was engraved by V. Green, and another by Hoppner, as a peasant, has also been engraved. Hoppner’s portrait was sold at Messrs. Robinson and Fisher’s rooms for 14,050 guineas on 27 June 1901. This portrait originally belonged to Louisa’s daughter, Lady Laura Tollemache, from whom it passed to Louisa’s granddaughter, Maria, Marchioness of Ailesbury, and finally came into the possession of the latter’s daughter-in-law, the Lady Charles Bruce, by whose executors it was sold.[3] Thomas Lawrence‘s portrait of Lady Louisa was exhibited at the Royal Academy in 1794.[4] Louisa was a notable patron of John Constable, entertaining him at Helmingham, Ham House and London residences at Pall Mall and in Piccadilly. Constable’s letters make several references to Lady Dysart and he was evidently at ease with the family. Louisa employed his brother, Golding Constable, as gamekeeper at Helingham.[1] Constable painted copies of Reynolds’ and Hoppner’s works, including a portrait of Louisa dated 1823.[5] Others to derive works from Hoppner, Lawrence and Reynolds portraits of Louisa include Henry Bone, Charles Knight and Richard Smythe.[6]

Excerpt above from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The National Trust own a version of this very same ‘portrait type’ of The Right Honorable Lady Louisa Manners sporting a ‘Pamela Hat’ —— this time by John Constable RA – after John Hoppner’s original version. What is evidently clear is that this particular portrait type of Lady Louisa Manners —— was painted by several great artists of the period.

Please also see a Mezzotint of John Hoppner’s portrait of ‘The Right Honorable Lady Louisa Manners’ in the British Museum collection —— which again proves that the original portrait was reproduced as early as 1807: The term, ‘Mezzotint’ is an engraving developed in the seventeenth century which allows for the creation of prints.

In the National Portrait Gallery collection,there is a pencil drawing squared in ink for transfer, dated August 1823 – again featuring Louisa Manners 7th Countess of Dysart – by Henry Bone, after John Hoppner.

Returning to the ‘Bonnet Portrait’ of Emily Brontë – it stands to reason that Charlotte – who aspired to be a professional miniature painter from an early age, could conceivably have been drawn to the popular image of Lady Louisa Manners wearing a ‘Pamela Hat’ as a starting model for a portrait of her sister, Emily…

On the back of the miniature version of the ‘Bonnet portrait’ there is a rough pencil outline tracing; something it has in common with an authenticated artwork by Charlotte in the Brontë Parsonage Museum collection, as stated in ‘The art of the Brontës’ —— 

The art of cloud-shaped thinking – “On verso: rough pencil outline tracing of the figure on recto.” courtesy of ‘The art of the Brontes’ – page 212.

The pencil outline on the back of the miniature ‘Bonnet’ has been sealed with Gum arabic…

All three versions of the ‘Bonnet Portrait’ – when turned to the light —— appear to have exactly the same finish…In light of these highlights —— I think it is highly improbable – that these three portraits of One subject – were painted by three different hands; especially as Charlotte was well versed in the use of Gum arabic – a transparent glaze applied to areas of shading to achieve greater depth and richer tone. 

The two larger versions of the ‘Bonnet’ share exactly the same proportions – only the paper size differs. The version on the right-hand side above – is actually on card.

Charlotte Brontë rarely drew from life – but what she did do was copy engravings then made them her own. I propose that the portrait of Lady Louisa Manners – was the inspiration for Charlotte’s earliest portrait of her sister, Emily. Only the cloak wrapped around Emily’s shoulders differs from the original ‘type’. For an outdoorsy person like Emily, a thick cloak was entirely appropriate attire —— and besides, it’s the job of a sensitive portraitist to not only capture a fair likeness of the person but also their essence.

It would seem that the main sticking point where the Daguerreotype of the Brontë Sisters is concerned is Emily’s hat choice again! I actually think that if one compares the largest of the ‘Bonnet’ portraits with the figure alleged to be Emily in the Daguerreotype – there’s a certain likeness, save for Emily’s “tight curl and frizz” that is…

Ellen Nussey, lifelong friend of the Brontës, wrote of her first impressions of the fifteen-year-old Emily: “Emily Brontë had by this time acquired a lithesome, graceful figure. She was the tallest person in the house, except her father. Her hair, which was naturally as beautiful as Charlotte’s, was in the same unbecoming tight curl and frizz, and there was the same want of complexion. She had very beautiful eyes – kind, kindling, liquid eyes; but she did not often look at you; she was too reserved. Their colour might be said to be dark grey, at other times dark blue, they varied so.”

“…kind, kindling, liquid eyes…”

To round off —— a recent episode of BBC ‘Flog It!’ featured a beautiful, enamelled antique brooch in the style of the ‘Bonnet Portrait’ – which goes to prove how popular this particular ‘portrait type’ was in the late 18th century and first half of the 19th…

In fact, it’s true to say a straw hat by itself is timeless – it’s only the ribbon or scarf tied under the chin —— that dates it.

Forget-Me-Not.


Addendum 15th. April 2020.

Howzabout this for ‘coincidence’; Charlotte Brontë makes mention of the very novel ‘Pamela; or, Virtue Rewarded’ by Samuel Richardson in the very first chapter of ‘Jane Eyre’ – which proves beyond all doubt that the author of ‘Jane Eyre’ was familiar with the very novel whose heroine gave name to the ‘Pamela Hat’ —— as worn by Lady Louisa Manners Countess of Dysart, 1821 – and later, by her sister, Emily —— circa 1830, aged roundabout twelve.

Another piece of the ‘lost’ portrait of Emily Bronte by Charlotte – FOUND.


To read about the influence of ‘Pamela’ in ‘Jane Eyre’ please use this link to The British Library – then see sub heading: ‘Pamela in Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre’ 

“Pamela continued to be popular and influential well into the 19th century. Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre alludes to Pamela early on, when Jane reads it as a young girl at Gateshead. This conscious reference invites the reader to compare and contrast the two plots which, as Jane Eyre unfolds, become more apparent…” 


Update.‘Some Bonnet and Black Hat Good Vibrations: The ‘Wood-Nymph’ by Samuel Woodforde’ —— brings ‘A Bevy of Bonnets for Easter Sunday: ‘The Pamela Hat.’ up-to-date, use this link to read on. . .

Some Bonnet and Black Hat Good Vibrations: The ‘Wood-Nymph’ by Samuel Woodforde.

9 thoughts on “A Bevy of Bonnets for Easter Sunday: ‘The Pamela Hat.’

  1. …interesting! Thank you. requires further work, to be noted separately in a forthcoming emaill message to you.

    Best wishes and thanks:

    • Interesting is good Christopher! I look forward to receiving your forthcoming communique. Grrrreeeekkkkkk!

    • Dear Gerda, Thank you for getting in touch.
      Your drawing is interesting – she’s called – as in after, ‘Wood Nymph’ by Samuel Woodforde R A (B: 1763 to D: 1817)…
      It’s just possible that your drawing is a copy of an engraving by John Raphael Smith – or quite maybe a preliminary sketch by Samuel Woodforde himself of his original painting of ‘Wood Nymph’ which must be in a private collection as there are seemingly no pictures available online of his original painting. Maybe the ‘S. M.’ initials on your drawing are a monogram for Samuel Woodforde, perhaps he did his ‘W’ upside down ‘M’? Just a guess where the artist’s initials are concerned but maybe you need to do some research on your drawing – as a Samuel Woodforde attribution would make it more valuable.
      I think it is evidently clear that ‘The Bonnet Portrait’ of Emily Bronte by Charlotte is derived from Samuel Woodforde’s painting ‘Wood Nymph’. It’s what Charlotte did – she meticulously copied engravings then gave them her own magical spin. Smith’s engraving of the ‘Wood Nymph’ was widely published in 1787 and after – so perfect timing with regards to the ‘lost’ portrait of Emily by Charlotte. ‘Wood Nymph’ by Samuel Woodforde doesn’t weaken the argument for ‘The Bonnet’ – it greatly strengthens it. Thank you for sharing your beautiful drawing with me – good luck with any further research you may decide to do with it?
      May I add a picture of your drawing to the footer of this page – plus your listing’s wording? with an acknowledgment of your permission if granted?
      Thank you for getting in touch from the Netherlands. X

    • Gerda, Disappointed that you haven’t acknowledged where you got your information from about Samuel Woodforde RA – in your newly worded listing – not even a thank you sent my way!

      • Hi, I am sorry that I did not get in touch earlier, but I just saw your posting of October 3 today (October 6) . I wish I had seen it earlier as it would have saved me so much time searching. I actually found it yesterday on google when I searched on the terms “georgian girl” combined with “firewood”, when I had some time to search again. And then looked on the website of the British Museum and reworded the listing yesterday. I would have been happy to have referred to your website if I had known that you had posted a reply.

        I have looked at Samuel Woodforde’s other drawings and he seems to have signed them with his full name. I have had the picture out to the frame in order to replace the old mount board with museum quality board to guard it from further damage. Unfortunately it does not give any indication about the drawing and I would not like to make any comment on when it was made and when, but whoever made it, loved the subject and had real talent/skills. It always shows. I just think it is beautiful and the face reminds me to some extent about Emma Hamilton as painted by Romney.

        Please feel free to use the photo. I am also happy to send you high resolution photographs of the drawing. Interestingly in the drawing she looks away from the observer, whilst in the prints the subject looks directly at you. I will also put a link on this page to your page tonight as I thought your posts very interesting.

        All the best, Gerda

        • Dear Gerda,
          Thank you for your understanding and for getting back to me – it would seem our wires got crossed! I’d love to feature your drawing on my site – thank you for your permission to use your beautiful image of the ‘Wood Nymph’. Perhaps if time allows tomorrow – I will do a post dedicated to your drawing – a new post in its honour. Your drawing is identical to the image on the antique enamel brooch sold on Flog It.
          I personally feel that Samuel Woodforde’s ‘Wood Nymph’ strengthens mine and Christopher Heywood’s argument for the ‘Bonnet Portrait’ of Emily Bronte – but the ‘Bonnet Haters’ out there will probably think and say otherwise…
          I love how you have rephrased your listing; I think our connection through our drawings is a magical thing, I’m so pleased that our wires are no longer crossed.X

          • Hello again,

            So happy that our wires are no longer crossed! I look forward to reading your post about the drawing of the Wood Nymph and am so happy that you like the drawing. Hopefully she will find a new home with people who will love her too.

            I love the way how you passionately write about the Bronte family and the drawing! Keep going! All the best, Gerda

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *